[CharterSchools] Educate Now!: School Governance...What's Next?

[charterschools at LACharter.org]

Educate Now! Having trouble viewing this email?Click here.





    

    
        

    
        

    

    
    



Forward this issue of Leslie's Notebook to a friend.

 


    


Leslie's Notebook




    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            
                                                  


 
New Orleans Public School Governance...What's Next?   

Who should authorize charter schools?

Who should manage school facilities?

 
Who should handle the money?
What should happen to the Orleans Parish School Board?
What about giving the mayor authority over schools?
What about an appointed school board? 

While these are all important questions, Educate Now! urges everyone to hit the pause button and take time to fully understand the "what" of school governance (what roles, functions, services must be in place) before looking at the "who" (what individuals, group, organization, or political entity or entities should be responsible for these functions). 
 





A Different Governance Model



                        


 
New Orleans is now a majority charter school district. This year, 61% of students attend charters, and come August, it will be close to 70%. Based on current projections, the percentage of students attending charters could easily reach 80-85% within the next few years. 
 
New Orleans will require a governance model that is different than anywhere else in the nation. This will be the case whether schools are returned to the Orleans Parish School Board or to a new entity or entities.
 
In the rest of the country, generally speaking, there is either: 


The traditional model:  A central governing authority - "the system"- manages operations and makes decisions for all schools; there are no charter schools. The governing authority might be an elected board, an appointed board, the mayor, etc.

OR

The competition model:  Public charter schools "compete" with a centralized system. This is the structure that was in New Orleans pre-Katrina when we had 9 charter schools and the system had more than 100 traditional schools.


 
In this model, charters are a small percentage of the total number of schools, and they rely on the system to handle issues that are "outside" of their schools, such as enrolling students who change schools mid-year or providing educational services to expelled students.  

Neither of these models will work for long term governance in New Orleans, for both of them assume "the system" has the majority of students, performs the majority of services and has the majority of the money. In New Orleans today, charters have the majority of students, perform the majority of services once manged by the district (hiring and firing staff, managing budgets, selecting the curriculum, providing transportation, etc.) and receive the money directly.
 

We have passed the point of whether or not we will have charters or even a limited number of charters. Charter schools enjoy strong public support, and student academic performance is improving. (For more information on public opinion and academic achievement, click here.) 
 

So the question is:  Now that the majority of schools in New Orleans are autonomous charter schools, what do we need from government so this "system of schools" performs well, serves all students and is sustainable?




The What Before the Who






 
Before New Orleans can decide who should be responsible for school governance, we must first determine what functions will be performed by individual schools or nonprofits, and what functions government must perform. 
 
This past summer, Educate Now! convened a group of 25 people, including national experts, representatives from charter schools, parent and business groups, and others to discuss long term governance. The goal was not to come up with "the answer" or even specific recommendations for a governance structure. Instead, our purpose was to understand the "What" before talking about the "Who." Specifically, we wanted to identify what students, schools and the community at large will need from the entity or entities that govern schools long term. 
 
Functions that Government Must Perform





Participants in the governance discussions identified everything a central office does in a traditional school district and eliminated those things that New Orleans schools or nonprofits can or should be doing. The result was a list of necessary functions we think government (not schools) must do if we are to have a coordinated and cohesive system of schools that serves all children. These functions fall into six categories.
 

These first three categories are the ones most commonly discussed:

 


1.   CHARTER AUTHORIZING

In any governance model, there will be a need for a chartering authority that: 

   ●
   Grants charters

   ●
   Oversees performance

   ●
   Renews charters

   ●
   Revokes charters 

   ●
   Maintains charter school quality


   
 



2.   FACILITY MANAGEMENT


School governance must include an entity that:


   ●

   Assigns campuses to school operators


   ●

   Establishes the length and terms of lease [the 


 

   responsibilities of the school (tenant) versus those of


 

   the landlord]. 


   ●

   Inspects and maintains school facilities 


   ●

   Secures and allocates capital funds for facilities 


   ●

   Optimizes efficiencies, e.g., insurance, utilities


   ●

   Manages construction 



 



3.   FINANCES

How money is raised and distributed across schools and students is a key governance function, including:

   ●
   Taxing and bonding authority

   ●
   Securing additional resources 

   ●
   Monitoring school use of funds

   ●
   Creating a local weighted student formula (WSF)

   ●
   Distributing funds using the weighted student

 
   formula (WSF) 



 
These next three roles have not received the same level of public conversation, but they must be assigned if New Orleans is to have a "system of schools" versus a "collection of schools."   
  


Serving All Students
The governance model must answer how all students will be served. The answers will likely include a  sophisticated funding formula that provides additional funds for alternative schools and special needs students as well as supporting alternative schools that specialize and excel in serving unique populations. Equally important is the need for additional "rule making" - especially around charter school enrollment policies. Charters will have to give up some of the enrollment autonomy that they traditionally enjoy elsewhere in the country. For example, a policy for mid-year
4.   SERVING ALL STUDENTS

Because these are public schools, we must ensure that all students are served. This includes:

  ●
  Making rules/policies that address:

 
  ◦   Enrollment, including mid-year enrollees

 
  ◦   Participation in the common application 

 
      process

 
  ◦   Special education:

 
      ·   All schools serving appropriately

 
      ·   Placement decisions when no local school 

 
          is appropriate

 
  ◦   Adjudicated youth

 
  ◦   Alternative needs students including drop outs

  ●
  Monitoring and enforcing the rules

  ●
  Assisting parents with finding schools

enrollees might require charters to accept more students, even if a school has reached its planned enrollment limit.  
  


5.  COMMUNICATIONS

Communications
The public needs a centralized source of information, a local forum for commentary and a means to engage with the system of schools. 

In addition, some entity will need to speak for the schools collectively when discussing public education or youth related policy issues with governmental bodies, businesses and other organizations. And in case of an emergency, such as a hurricane evacuation or a flu epidemic, there will need to be a consistency of protocol and management.

In addition to school sites' communication with their individual constituencies, there must also be coordinated, system-wide communication that: 


 ●
 Provides information to the general public,


 
 parents and schools 


 ●
 Creates a platform for broad public input


 
 (proactive) 


 ●
 Gives the public opportunities to address


 
 policy issues (reactive) 


 ●
 Represents schools with other governmental 


 
 bodies (Mayor, City Council, judges, legislature)


 ●
 Coordinates emergency management 


  
 (consistency of protocol & management)



 
 



5.  PLANNING


Government will need to collect, analyze and use data to evaluate system performance and to plan for future needs, including:


  ●

  Conducting demographic planning


  ●

  Determining the necessary number 


 

  and types of schools 


  ●

  Collecting and monitoring student data 


 

  (shared data system)


  





Principles to Drive Decision Making





 
Having agreed that the six categories listed above constitute the "what" of a new governance model, the group moved on to develop a vision statement and a set of principles to guide decision making about how these functions should be assigned.  
 

Vision Statement

New Orleans should have a system of governance for public education that empowers and requires individual schools to excel and provides the coordination and fairness necessary to serve the needs of all students and the public.

Having quality, high performing schools for all students is critical and non-negotiable and should not be jeopardized. As long as school quality is not compromised, any governance decisions can be adjusted over time as we learn more.
 
Principles





 



Autonomy


Autonomy is critical for high quality, effective schools and must be protected.


 

 


 All schools, charter or traditional, should have authority over: 


●

   Personnel and related functions


●

   Budget


 

 


In addition, all charter schools should have authority over:


●

   Direct governance of their schools


●

   Curriculum and instruction


●

   Time, including school calendar and length of day


●

   Handling and resolving school level issues in compliance with their charter 


 

   contract and established school policies. School level issues are first 


 

   addressed at the school level.  


  


Quality Authorizing


Quality Authorizing ensures:


●

   Focus on academic performance


●

   Protection of charter autonomy


 

   ◦  Preventing burdensome rules and regulations


 

   ◦  Protecting schools from political pressure


●

   Compliance with charter contracts


●

   Low performance results in transfer of direct school


 

   governance to another operator


  



Parent Choice


Parent Choice is protected.


●

Information on schools is easily accessible, timely 


 

and understandable by parents.


●

Schools that do not have selective admissions 


 

are part of a coordinated, simplified open enrollment process.


●

The desire for neighborhood schools is balanced with


 

the need for parents to be able to choose a school 


 

outside of their neighborhood.


 



Local Voice


Local Voice is heard.


●
The charter authorizer is either local, or if it is a state 

 
authorizer (like BESE), it has a local office to 

 
respond to local issues and concerns.  

●
Clarity is provided so the public understands where 

 
to go with particular issues.


  



Equity


Resources (facilities and local, state and federal 


revenues) are sufficient, well-managed and fairly


allocated across schools.


●

The same amount of money should follow an individual


 

student no matter whether it is to a charter or to a 


 

traditional school. 


●

Some students, such as special needs students, 


 

should have more money allocated to them. 



  



Separation of Power


Whoever manages the resources (facilities and money) does not operate schools and is impartial as to whether a school is a public charter or traditional school.




Charter schools should not have to compete with schools operated by the resource manager for fair allocation of resources.



 
 




What's Next?





 
Once we have agreed on the critical functions that must be performed by government, the next question is:  How should these functions be structured? 

Should all functions be managed by one entity? 
Should we divide the functions into separate entities, with one entity handling resources (facilities and taxing) and another authorizing charters? 
Should there be a separate and distinct Facility Authority, and if so, how would it coordinate with the other entity or entities so there is a shared vision and priorities? A facility manager might think repairing facilities is the number one priority, while the authorizer might think additional monies for school operations is most critical. Who decides?

These are exciting times for New Orleans. Educate Now! is committed to expanding the input and ideas that began with these discussions and welcomes your comments. Please email me at ljacobs at educatenow.net with your thoughts. Or, if you would like Educate Now! to make a presentation to, or meet with, your organization, please contact us. 
 


        
        
            




Educate Now!

Leslie Jacobs
Founder
 
 
 
For more information, please visit our website: www.educatenow.net.

 
Comments? Please send them to info at educatenow.net. 

 
If you are not currently a member of Educate Now! and would like to receive information from us, please visit our website www.educatenow.net to register.



 


        
        
            
                                               
            
        
                
    
    
    

    

    

    
        






 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://nine.pairlist.net/pipermail/charterschools/attachments/20100409/4f6cc979/attachment-0001.htm>