[Hackrf-dev] HackRF DX 100Km on 1296.1

[Scott Davis]

Yes, but to avoid possible RX damage, you can just use a dummy load on the HackRF.

It’s odd that people interested in RX-only would spend the extra money instead of getting an RTL or FCD or AirSpy or SDRPlay or….

-Scott

On Sep 23, 2015, at 4:59 PM, Toth, Gregory S <gregory.s.toth at boeing.com> wrote:

> I assume that even without a license, it is ok to use a 50 ohm coax cable to connect the Hack RF antenna jack directly to the input of an appropriate receiver? Probably could use an inline attenuator just in case.
>  
> From: HackRF-dev [mailto:hackrf-dev-bounces at greatscottgadgets.com] On Behalf Of C Crane
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 1:58 PM
> To: Chuck McManis
> Cc: hackrf-dev at greatscottgadgets.com; Dana Shtun
> Subject: Re: [Hackrf-dev] HackRF DX 100Km on 1296.1
>  
> Perhaps so. It just surprised me that there wasn't more overall interest. I thought there would be more people playing with different modes and what not. I guess I incorrectly assumed most of those with an interest in RF would also probably be licensed. 
>  
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Chuck McManis <chuck.mcmanis at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:39 PM, C Crane <ccrane148 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Unfortunately, nobody seems too interesting in transmitting.
> 
> I think that is unfair. Perhaps it is more accurate that the Majority
> of HackRF owners are not licensed to transmit, and so they don't.
> Because there is tremendous value and fun to be had just on the
> receiving side.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> HackRF-dev mailing list
> HackRF-dev at greatscottgadgets.com
> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist9.pair.net/pipermail/hackrf-dev/attachments/20150923/55ebc0c8/attachment.html>